OffThePost.org http://offthepost.org/ |
|
VANEKOUVER http://offthepost.org/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=7888 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Pokecheque [ Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | VANEKOUVER |
https://twitter.com/frank_seravalli/sta ... 6610039810 Quote: #canucks have signed Thomas Vanek to a one-year, $2 million deal.
|
Author: | E.L. [ Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
Why the hell not, eh? |
Author: | Chris18 [ Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
Not a bad deal for either. He could prove he can still play. Maybe. This time... |
Author: | E.L. [ Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
Chris18 wrote: Not a bad deal for either. He could prove he can still play. Maybe. This time... Vanek's betting on himself |
Author: | Pokecheque [ Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
E.L. wrote: Vanek's betting on himself |
Author: | Chris18 [ Sun Sep 03, 2017 11:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
Pokecheque wrote: E.L. wrote: Vanek's betting on himself |
Author: | Logical Progression [ Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
Pokecheque wrote: https://twitter.com/frank_seravalli/status/903732156610039810 The Canucks ostensibly just bought a mid-round draft pick (hopefully) in acquiring Vanek.
Quote: #canucks have signed Thomas Vanek to a one-year, $2 million deal. |
Author: | the Cunning Linguist [ Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
Logical Progression wrote: Pokecheque wrote: https://twitter.com/frank_seravalli/status/903732156610039810 The Canucks ostensibly just bought a mid-round draft pick (hopefully) in acquiring Vanek.Quote: #canucks have signed Thomas Vanek to a one-year, $2 million deal. Been really quite impressed with Vanek. Can we re-up him for another year? He and Eriksson have made that second unit PP look dangerous, he seems to make things happen whenever he has the puck inside the opposing blue line. Points now in 5 straight games. Mid-round draft pick or higher if they can't re-sign him. |
Author: | the Cunning Linguist [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
At this point, I really wish Benning had signed Tommy Gunn for three years instead of Sam Gagner... |
Author: | Pokecheque [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
the Cunning Linguist wrote: At this point, I really wish Benning had signed Tommy Gunn for three years instead of Sam Gagner... Columbus apparently can't score on the power play without him, so maybe a deal can be made to flip him back. |
Author: | the Cunning Linguist [ Fri Dec 01, 2017 2:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
Pokecheque wrote: the Cunning Linguist wrote: At this point, I really wish Benning had signed Tommy Gunn for three years instead of Sam Gagner... Columbus apparently can't score on the power play without him, so maybe a deal can be made to flip him back. Well, Green hasn't figured out how to use Gagner; if they can flip him back, I'd be all for that. If Goldobin can stick, and with Petterson and Dahlen coming up, Gagner long-term seems silly... Find a new mailing address for Burmistrov, too, especially with Sutter coming back eventually. Goldobin / Horvat / Boeser Baertschi / Granlund / Vanek Daniel / Henrik / Erikkson ($20M line!!) Gaunce / Gagner / Virtanen (Burmistrov) It's bittersweet that Goldobin's opportunity arose only because DD of retirement. I understand that Vanek will probably yield a better return but he's been fun to watch in most games. |
Author: | CanuckinOz [ Thu Dec 07, 2017 4:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
It'll be interesting to see what happens with Gagner now that Horvat is hurt, speculation is that he'll be tried centering Boeser and Goldobin, maybe that will bring him to life. You're right Vanek has been fun to watch, a much better signing then I thought it would be. |
Author: | Pokecheque [ Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:41 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: VANEKOUVER |
Anyone see the Kovalchuk quote calling Vanek a “cocaine vacuum” at the last Olympics? |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |