Vasi got pulled last night
Controversy over!
| OffThePost.org http://offthepost.org/ |
|
| Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread http://offthepost.org/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=7727 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | hammer [ Tue Nov 29, 2016 1:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Vasilevskiy: 6-1-1, 1.50 GAA (leads league), 0.951 save % (leads league) Bishop: 7-8, 3.04 GAA, .902 save % Clearly the plan in TBay was for Bishop to be the clear #1 and Vasi play 20-30 games while being groomed to be the goalie of the future starting next year with Big Ben a UFA. Vasi is really forcing the issue but so far doens't seem like TBay management is budging on their plan, and are going to give Bishop a long leash. With Stamkos out for months though TBay can't afford to give away any games. |
|
| Author: | E.L. [ Tue Nov 29, 2016 2:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Could it be they're playing Bishop in the hopes he recovers to the point that he's tradeable? |
|
| Author: | hammer [ Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
^^^probably. But if going on a serious Cup run better to have Vasi + Bishop than Vasi + Gudslevekis (sp). But then Bishop walks for nothing as UFA, which Stevie Y has probably accepted. |
|
| Author: | E.L. [ Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Considering how tight they are against the cap, dealing Bishop somewhere for a pick, then using the cap money on a more immediate need (like a rental to replace Stamkos if he doesn't recover in time) is a card Stevie can play. |
|
| Author: | hammer [ Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Looks like I jinxed Vasilevskiy as he had his worst game of the year after this thread. But looks like they are going back to him tonight, 1st consecutive starts of the season. |
|
| Author: | hammer [ Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Vasi got pulled last night Controversy over! |
|
| Author: | E.L. [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Controversy over, for real this time: Bishop traded to LA for Budaj. From Vezina candidate to low-end rental. |
|
| Author: | hammer [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Stevie Y says there was no market for goalies, it was this deal or stand pat. Don't really get why the Kings did this after Budaj served them so well. |
|
| Author: | Chris18 [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 2:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Salary dump for another move? I get it from LA's perspective- they get an upgrade, who probably pushes quick to be better. Or, they put in Bishop. |
|
| Author: | Pokecheque [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Chris18 wrote: Salary dump for another move? I get it from LA's perspective- they get an upgrade, who probably pushes quick to be better. Or, they put in Bishop. The Bishop deal was so no bonus overages land on next year's cap. Yzerman has also said they're trying to make the playoffs, but I can't imagine they're clearing cap room to trade for someone else. |
|
| Author: | E.L. [ Mon Jul 29, 2019 9:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Andrei Vasilevskiy signs an 8-year extension that kicks in next season: $9.5M AAV, almost $45M in bonuses |
|
| Author: | Pokecheque [ Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Wow...I feel like any deal that's higher than 5X5 is pretty risky for a goalie, but I suppose if you want to go big, go big with a Vezina winner while he's still young. |
|
| Author: | E.L. [ Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Does that mean Kucherov eventually becomes the odd man out? Not sure you can have Stamkos-Kooch-Point-Vassy making 36-40M on the cap. |
|
| Author: | Pokecheque [ Mon Jul 29, 2019 5:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
E.L. wrote: Does that mean Kucherov eventually becomes the odd man out? Not sure you can have Stamkos-Kooch-Point-Vassy making 36-40M on the cap. They'll go full jetsam with Gourde, Palat, Johnson, and/or Sergachev before they'd even think about ever losing Kooch. Stamkos, Kucherov, Point, Hedman, and Vasilevskiy are the core of this team going forward. I think if they REALLY had to, they'd dump Stamkos first before those other guys. But I think they'd just pull a Chicago and keep moving various pieces around those guys in hopes they get the right mix. |
|
| Author: | Pokecheque [ Tue Jul 30, 2019 4:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Tampa is just stockpiling goalies! Now they have Domingue and a used Condon. |
|
| Author: | Logical Progression [ Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Pokecheque wrote: Tampa is just stockpiling goalies! Now they have Domingue and a used Condon. 
|
|
| Author: | Chris18 [ Sat Aug 03, 2019 8:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goalie (not yet) controversey / Vasilevskiy WOOD thread |
Logical Progression wrote: Pokecheque wrote: Tampa is just stockpiling goalies! Now they have Domingue and a used Condon. Seriously. That was a dirty dad joke. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|