saskhab wrote:
it's just that they couldn't execute a basic, fundamental hockey play. That first goal said everything... no one was close to receive the puck from Khabibulin, they were late on the backcheck for Kesler, and no one picked up Raymond at all. Where were all the guys on that Canucks dump in? I still haven't figured that one out. That's a basic, fundamental hockey play, and there was nothing that was positive on it at all.
The 'Hawks forwards haven't been helping out their d enough - if I had to guess, I'd say their forwards were cheating up ice, expecting more long bombs. Late in Game 1 when the score was still tied, they got caught with four of five skaters deep in Vancouver's end; 4-on-1 the other way and the winning goal by Salo. How do you give up a 4-on-1 late in a tied game? They've been living off of the long stretch pass and now are a victim of their own success... They were more successful with that plan in Game 2 so they tried to look for that in Game 3. The forwards need to get back and support their defencemen on the backcheck, especially since Vancouver has figured out that an aggressive forecheck in Chicago's end can bottle them up and slow them down.
I don't know if Q is the guy to get them to see that. His comments after the game seemed to be focused on how his offence played; I think Vancouver beat them by playing their style of game (deep forecheck and limit shots to the perimeter) and not allowing Chicago an easy out.