OffThePost.org

(Generation III)
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:36 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:37 pm 
Offline
Finally figured out how to change this!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:54 pm
Posts: 11716
I'll never understand teams not having their own AHL affiliates. And how far apart some teams are from their affiliates, although I think that has gotten better in recent years.

_________________
Posting your political views on social media is like sticking your head up your ass & whispering: You're just as likely to change someone's mind, and you'll always come out looking like a shithead.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2023 7:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:47 am
Posts: 5252
Historically there were no teams in the west. Flying cost was too great for just one or two teams to go it alone, but there are enough farm teams in the west now that it is both financially viable and preferable to have your farm team close by.

_________________
Shoresy, "It's called a sweater"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 12:59 am 
Offline
Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 26169
Fogghorn wrote:
Historically there were no teams in the west. Flying cost was too great for just one or two teams to go it alone, but there are enough farm teams in the west now that it is both financially viable and preferable to have your farm team close by.


Yeah, once they moved a lot of the teams over to the west coast with franchises in Ontario (which I did not know until recently was founded by a couple Canadians and that's why it's named after the Province) and San Jose everyone had their AHL affiliates somewhere in the Eastern US. It was comical in the early 2000s when the Kings, who were one of the most ridiculously injury-prone teams of the era, racked up some serious air miles because their affiliate, the Monarchs, were in frickin' Manchester, New Hampshire.

Chris18 wrote:
I'll never understand teams not having their own AHL affiliates. And how far apart some teams are from their affiliates, although I think that has gotten better in recent years.


Let's keep in mind that until the Colorado Eagles made the jump from the ECHL to the AHL, there were more NHL franchises than available AHL affiliates. So it was much more common than you might think.

I have almost zero sympathy for the Canes--they had an affiliate RIGHT THERE in Charlotte and let things go south (though to be fair I believe the Checkers' owner has a bit of a rep himself), then affiliated with a franchise well-known for wanting to do things their own way. I suppose the silver lining is that the Canes aren't really rife with AHL prospects at present.

From what I understand, the Hershey Bears act in a pretty independent manner, but they've been the farm club for the Capitals for many, many years now and that relationship doesn't appear to be problematic at all. The Americans and Sabres butted heads quite a bit until Terry Pegula up and bought the franchise.

One thing I understand about each affiliate--the AHL club has to incorporate the helmets and pants of the parent club, the players aren't allowed to switch. This really screwed the Eagles in Loveland when they proudly came out with blue jerseys, only to find out the Avs abruptly switched from black to blue helmets/pants a couple years back, so they came out (and still look like) Smurfs on skates. But for whatever reason, Hershey and Chicago are exempt from this rule. I can see, from a historical perspective, why the Bears get an exemption, but not the Wolves.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2023 7:35 am 
Offline
Finally figured out how to change this!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:54 pm
Posts: 11716
Yeah, I remember double affiliations. Isles and Blues shared an affiliate (Springfield Indians in Springfield, MA if I'm remembering correctly). That's how Jamie MacLennan saved his career. After he had meningitis the Isles were basically like "this kid's done". Almost nobody from the Isles even reached out to see how he was doing/wish him well. The Blues org made a much bigger effort to check on him. The Isles didn't give him a QO (or whatever the system was back then) and the Blues signed him. He has pretty much hated the Isles after that and I don't blame him.

_________________
Posting your political views on social media is like sticking your head up your ass & whispering: You're just as likely to change someone's mind, and you'll always come out looking like a shithead.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 11:46 am 
Offline
OTP Historian
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 11163
Pokecheque wrote:
Fogghorn wrote:
Historically there were no teams in the west. Flying cost was too great for just one or two teams to go it alone, but there are enough farm teams in the west now that it is both financially viable and preferable to have your farm team close by.


Yeah, once they moved a lot of the teams over to the west coast with franchises in Ontario (which I did not know until recently was founded by a couple Canadians and that's why it's named after the Province) and San Jose everyone had their AHL affiliates somewhere in the Eastern US. It was comical in the early 2000s when the Kings, who were one of the most ridiculously injury-prone teams of the era, racked up some serious air miles because their affiliate, the Monarchs, were in frickin' Manchester, New Hampshire.

Chris18 wrote:
I'll never understand teams not having their own AHL affiliates. And how far apart some teams are from their affiliates, although I think that has gotten better in recent years.


Let's keep in mind that until the Colorado Eagles made the jump from the ECHL to the AHL, there were more NHL franchises than available AHL affiliates. So it was much more common than you might think.

I have almost zero sympathy for the Canes--they had an affiliate RIGHT THERE in Charlotte and let things go south (though to be fair I believe the Checkers' owner has a bit of a rep himself), then affiliated with a franchise well-known for wanting to do things their own way. I suppose the silver lining is that the Canes aren't really rife with AHL prospects at present.

From what I understand, the Hershey Bears act in a pretty independent manner, but they've been the farm club for the Capitals for many, many years now and that relationship doesn't appear to be problematic at all. The Americans and Sabres butted heads quite a bit until Terry Pegula up and bought the franchise.

One thing I understand about each affiliate--the AHL club has to incorporate the helmets and pants of the parent club, the players aren't allowed to switch. This really screwed the Eagles in Loveland when they proudly came out with blue jerseys, only to find out the Avs abruptly switched from black to blue helmets/pants a couple years back, so they came out (and still look like) Smurfs on skates. But for whatever reason, Hershey and Chicago are exempt from this rule. I can see, from a historical perspective, why the Bears get an exemption, but not the Wolves.


The Wolves I believe had some affiliations but were run very independently as well.

_________________
Thanks Chuck, E.L. and Harmy!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2023 6:14 pm 
Offline
Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 26169
Strange stuff goin' on in Carolina.

Antti Raanta waived (and cleared), they sign Aaron Dell to a PTO after the previous PTO with Jaro Halak doesn't work out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2024 4:03 pm 
Offline
Big in Japan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:37 am
Posts: 14271
Location: 'Real City
This team needs a jolt, but they're pretty good.

Kotkaniemi has 4 points in his last 32 games, and with the way his contract is and his age, the team should probably buy him out at season's end.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group