OffThePost.org

(Generation III)
It is currently Wed May 15, 2024 10:13 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:10 pm 
Offline
Old Man of the Post
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:53 pm
Posts: 6856
Location: Inside your computer
Nucks tuning up for the playoffs... Hoping for no injuries... Schneids scheduled to start I believe...

Phlegms still stinging from that 7-3 shellacking 82 games ago... Wanting to rain on the Nucks President's Trophy parade.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:22 pm 
Offline
Promoted from Lt. Chaos
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:25 pm
Posts: 4024
Location: Vancouver
Too bad it's a meaningless game for both teams in terms of playoffs...

_________________
GO CANUCKS GO!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:47 am
Posts: 5287
Captain Chaos wrote:
Too bad it's a meaningless game for both teams in terms of playoffs...


You'd prefer the Canucks to be fighting for a playoff spot? Myself I could easily get used to games 76-82 being meaningless every year as long as it means they've clinched and not fighting for a draft pick. ;)

_________________
Shoresy, "It's called a sweater"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:47 pm 
Offline
Old Man of the Post
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:53 pm
Posts: 6856
Location: Inside your computer
Fogghorn wrote:
Captain Chaos wrote:
Too bad it's a meaningless game for both teams in terms of playoffs...


You'd prefer the Canucks to be fighting for a playoff spot? Myself I could easily get used to games 76-82 being meaningless every year as long as it means they've clinched and not fighting for a draft pick. ;)

True... But you have to admit, these are uncharted waters as far as Canucks teams go.

Only thing to play for is to make sure that Daniel pads his stats so Perry can't catch him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:47 am
Posts: 5287
the Cunning Linguist wrote:
Fogghorn wrote:
Captain Chaos wrote:
Too bad it's a meaningless game for both teams in terms of playoffs...


You'd prefer the Canucks to be fighting for a playoff spot? Myself I could easily get used to games 76-82 being meaningless every year as long as it means they've clinched and not fighting for a draft pick. ;)

True... But you have to admit, these are uncharted waters as far as Canucks teams go.

Only thing to play for is to make sure that Daniel pads his stats so Perry can't catch him.


Very, very uncharted but when the biggest storm concern is how to improve the stats in your sigs I like it. Speaking of which, assuming we get a three goal lead, what's the chances of Av asking players to intentionally whack someone to incur a penalty to try improve the PK %. I don't actually think it will happens but the thought of players having carte blanche for payback amuses me. :twisted:

_________________
Shoresy, "It's called a sweater"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:02 pm 
Offline
Promoted from Lt. Chaos
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:25 pm
Posts: 4024
Location: Vancouver
Fogghorn wrote:
Captain Chaos wrote:
Too bad it's a meaningless game for both teams in terms of playoffs...


You'd prefer the Canucks to be fighting for a playoff spot? Myself I could easily get used to games 76-82 being meaningless every year as long as it means they've clinched and not fighting for a draft pick. ;)


Nope. I'd prefer the Nucks just where they are with the Flames fighting for a playoff spot. :munch:

_________________
GO CANUCKS GO!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:15 pm 
Offline
Old Man of the Post
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:53 pm
Posts: 6856
Location: Inside your computer
Fogghorn wrote:
Very, very uncharted but when the biggest storm concern is how to improve the stats in your sigs I like it. Speaking of which, assuming we get a three goal lead, what's the chances of Av asking players to intentionally whack someone to incur a penalty to try improve the PK %. I don't actually think it will happens but the thought of players having carte blanche for payback amuses me. :twisted:

Yeah unless the Canucks kill about 10 more penalties in this game, I doubt they'll improve that much from their current position on their own. They'll need the other teams to give up PP goals. Would be nIce to get that clean sheet though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:17 pm 
Offline
Old Man of the Post
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:53 pm
Posts: 6856
Location: Inside your computer
http://www.theprovince.com/sports/hocke ... story.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:59 am 
Offline
Promoted from Lt. Chaos
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:25 pm
Posts: 4024
Location: Vancouver
Nucks 3-2 in OT

Entertaining game. Flames blow a 2-0 lead in the third. Bring on the Playoffs!

_________________
GO CANUCKS GO!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group