OffThePost.org

(Generation III)
It is currently Sun May 12, 2024 6:10 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 10:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:47 am
Posts: 5283
We've had a few posts on the two of them. Seems to me this conversation is going to go on for the next decade if they remain healthy so why not start a thread.

At the beginning of the year I thought if they both stayed healthy they would be sure fire future Hockey Hall of Famers. Perhaps even amongst the top 25 dmen of all time. I also thought Makar was the slightly better dman, but given that Hughes was a year younger and never played on a good team he had slightly more potential career wise than Makar.

I've changed my opinion. Hughes is the better dman, and will continue to be. Hughes is the best player the Canucks have ever had. And had moved his game up to a level that surpasses Makar. He's the third dman to achieve 200 assists over 3 seasons, Coffey and Orr being the others. And the teams those two played on were far superior to the Canucks and the eras they played in far more conducive to scoring goals. How good do you have to be to get those kinds of numbers with two years of crappy Canucks teams, in this day and age?

Can a little guy be good at defense? Hell YES!

Quote:
among the 120 NHL defencemen who have played at least 1000 5-on-5 minutes this season, Quinn Hughes has the fourth-lowest rate of shot attempts against when he’s on the ice. Makar is 56th.


https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/canu ... se-8561908

I still think Makar will win the Norris. I'm not sure the eastern press realize how good Hughes is. I also think if Hughes stays healthy over his career he is likely to become recognized as the best American dman ever. Surpassing guys like Chelios and Leetch. One of the top 10 dman of all time.

_________________
Shoresy, "It's called a sweater"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 2:37 pm 
Offline
Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 26233
Tough decision. My biases have me lean toward Cale, obviously. The one thing that would hold me back is the fact that Makar is extremely injury prone, and right now is clearly trying to play through something that will likely require major surgery to correct. Quinn might not play as punishing a style, and might be more durable overall (hopefully more durable than his big brother Jack).

I think Quinn is better defensively, but Cale is the more explosive, more dynamic offensive catalyst. Whether that changes over time, we'll see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 3:15 pm 
Offline
Big in Japan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:37 am
Posts: 14326
Location: 'Real City
If we're talking about building from the ground up, I think Hughes might be more capable of succeeding with less around him than Makar. I don't know why I feel that, I don't think it relates to their current circumstances (they're both on great teams).

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 4:05 pm 
Offline
Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 26233
E.L. wrote:
If we're talking about building from the ground up, I think Hughes might be more capable of succeeding with less around him than Makar. I don't know why I feel that, I don't think it relates to their current circumstances (they're both on great teams).


I suppose it's the coaching. Makar has only had one, Bednar, while Quinn has had, what, three now? And one could argue (I wouldn't) that none of them are particularly good. Also, Makar has, arguably, had better talent in front of him and below him on the depth chart, whereas I still think the Canucks defensive corps is quite bad beyond that top pairing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2024 8:11 pm 
Offline
Finally figured out how to change this!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:54 pm
Posts: 11760
McDavid.

_________________
Posting your political views on social media is like sticking your head up your ass & whispering: You're just as likely to change someone's mind, and you'll always come out looking like a shithead.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 11:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:47 am
Posts: 5283
I'm becoming less doubtful about Hughes likelihood of winning the Norris, even though I feel he clearly deserves it. I actually think he deserves consideration for the Hart. The reason for the change, is that there folks with votes discussing Hughes for the Hart. I can't see him doing it, dmen almost never win the Hart even though they should. But just being in that conversation indicates to me that maybe there is momentum behind him winning the Norris.

When it comes down to the Hart, are any of McDavid, MacKinnon and Kucherov more important to their teams than Hughes? I think if Hughes didn't play the way he has this year the Nucks don't make the playoffs. He is having a best season of any Canuck in the history of the franchise. Still he's a dman, probably only gets 4th place at best in the Hart voting.

_________________
Shoresy, "It's called a sweater"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 1:29 pm 
Offline
OTP Historian
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 11168
Fogghorn wrote:
Still he's a dman, probably only gets 4th place at best in the Hart voting.


*Checks Nick Lidstrom's Hart record* No shame in finishing 4th!

He's making a case for himself(and Bieksa mentioned it on Saturday) but the point totals at the top are hard to ignore. And so is Kucherov's lead over his teammates.

_________________
Thanks Chuck, E.L. and Harmy!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2024 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:47 am
Posts: 5283
Bosc wrote:
Fogghorn wrote:
Still he's a dman, probably only gets 4th place at best in the Hart voting.


*Checks Nick Lidstrom's Hart record* No shame in finishing 4th!

He's making a case for himself(and Bieksa mentioned it on Saturday) but the point totals at the top are hard to ignore. And so is Kucherov's lead over his teammates.


I mean Pronger was good, but never Lidstrom level good and yet he won a Hart. If any dman of the last 40 years deserved a Hart it was Lidstrom.

_________________
Shoresy, "It's called a sweater"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group