OffThePost.org

(Generation III)
It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 3:36 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:20 am 
Offline
OTP Historian
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 4626
Can I sticky this? Yeah, I'll sticky this.

Guess what? Anschutz and Leipold want their money back

Quote:
The owner of the Los Angeles Kings has joined the owner of the Minnesota Wild in a legal motion aimed at recouping the $17 million (all figures U.S.) they loaned to a William (Boots) Del Biaggio so he could buy part of the Nashville Predators.

It's a move that puts Kings owner Phil Anschutz and Wild owner Craig Leipold in direct competition with Nashville's current ownership group led by David Freeman, as well as would-be investors – believed to include Canadian billionaire Jim Balsillie.

The bankruptcy court will hear arguments on Nov. 21 from lawyers representing Anschutz's AEG Facilities, which is owed $7 million, and Leipold, owed $10 million. They'll argue they should be allowed to foreclose on the loans they gave Del Biaggio ahead of all other creditors who are owed money from the disgraced financier. He owes about $57 million.

That would give them part ownership of the Predators, but the NHL would likely force both to sell.

In other documents released yesterday, it became clear the trustee overseeing the case – Todd Neilson – has considered selling Del Biaggio's 27 per cent share of the team.

Earlier this week, Neilson suggested the Predators were dragging their feet in providing financial information needed to assess the value of Del Biaggio's assets. The team is arguing in court Del Biaggio's shares in the team should simply be eliminated, without anyone else buying them.

Neilson has identified Del Biaggio's share of the team as the most valuable commodity in his portfolio. Bankruptcy experts believe a public auction might provide the best return for the trustee to repay Del Biaggio's assets.


That is frigging awesome. A guy with virtually no assets to speak of gets money to buy a team. Since he has no money, he has to borrow money from 1) Another owner in the league who owns the building that he wants to move the team into and 2) The fucking guy that he's buying the team from. Now they want their money back, and since Bootsie has no money, they want their stake in the team.

What's the NHL's process for evaluating potential owners again?

_________________
Thanks Chuck!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:20 pm 
Offline
Promoted from Lt. Chaos
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:25 pm
Posts: 3614
Location: Vancouver
BoscUlrichIII wrote:
What's the NHL's process for evaluating potential owners again?


His name alone "Boots" Del Biaggio - should have given them their first clue. Sounds like a character out of a bad gangster movie.

_________________
GO CANUCKS GO!

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:27 pm 
Offline
OTP Historian
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 4626
Captain Chaos wrote:
BoscUlrichIII wrote:
What's the NHL's process for evaluating potential owners again?


His name alone "Boots" Del Biaggio - should have given them their first clue. Sounds like a character out of a bad gangster movie.


More like his grandmother's cat.

_________________
Thanks Chuck!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:03 am 
Offline
Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:51 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Ottawa, ON
Captain Chaos wrote:
His name alone "Boots" Del Biaggio - should have given them their first clue. Sounds like a character out of a bad gangster movie.

This has been my point all along -- how could anyone have ever even entertained the notion of a guy called "Boots" in the 21st century conducting serious business? (Though to be fair, I was picturing the 'Rich Texan' from the Simpsons every time, and just thought it was weird he wanted a hockey team).

Can you imagine if Aquilini really went by "Aquaman" or Ilitch made everyone call him "Little Caesar" or something?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:07 pm 
Offline
Flamer who Likes to Ride Rough

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:34 am
Posts: 295
Jyrki21 wrote:
(Though to be fair, I was picturing the 'Rich Texan' from the Simpsons every time, and just thought it was weird he wanted a hockey team).


Glad it's not just me. :clint:

What debacle though. There are conflicts of interest all over the place and somehow the league let this transaction pass in the first place...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:18 pm 
Offline
OTP Historian
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 4626
DH wrote:
Jyrki21 wrote:
(Though to be fair, I was picturing the 'Rich Texan' from the Simpsons every time, and just thought it was weird he wanted a hockey team).


Glad it's not just me. :clint:

What debacle though. There are conflicts of interest all over the place and somehow the league let this transaction pass in the first place...


"Somehow"? This is just par for the course for the NHL :lol:

_________________
Thanks Chuck!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:32 pm 
Offline
2003-04 Goalie Profiles Coming Soon!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:13 pm
Posts: 8171
Location: Saskabush
Everyone likes to gang up on the NHL for the Boots fiasco (fair enough, they deserve it), but I still think Leipold and Anschutz are the biggest idiots (and the ones that acted most inapproriately not named 'Boots') in this mess.

_________________
I will smash your face into a, into a jelly!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:20 pm 
Offline
OTP Historian
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 4626
NHL adopts disclosure policy for owners

Quote:
NHL owners accustomed to minding their own business now have to disclose it, courtesy of a new policy instituted by the league in late September.

In response to a series of unknown financial arrangements between former Nashville Predators owner William “Boots” Del Biaggio and two other NHL owners, the league’s board of governors adopted a new policy that requires owners to disclose any and all business and financial relationships between one another.

The rule means that an owner like AEG, which owns the Los Angeles Kings, must submit to the league every single one of the arenas that it manages that also serve as home to an NHL club, like Jobing.com where the Phoenix Coyotes play. The same is true for Jeremy Jacobs, who owns the Bruins and Delaware North, an arena concessions company with business throughout the league.

All 30 of the league’s clubs have complied with the new rule since it was instituted in late September, said league sources who spoke anonymously because of the privacy of the new policy.

The rule also extends to potential new owners. As part of the application process for NHL ownership, future buyers of NHL clubs will be required to disclose any business ties with other NHL owners at the time of the potential purchase.


The rules are a response to the disclosures that Minnesota Wild owner Craig Leipold and AEG loaned $10 million and $7 million, respectively, to Del Biaggio before his purchase of the Predators last year. The league was unaware of the loans and caught off guard when they were disclosed this summer in a bankruptcy filing by Del Biaggio.

Part of the reason the rule extended beyond financial loans to all business arrangements was because AEG Chief Executive Tim Leiweke told the New York Post that his loan was made so AEG might win management rights to the Nashville arena. He said it wasn’t given to influence the Predators to relocate to the arena AEG operates in Kansas City.

In addition to requiring clubs to disclose business relationships, the NHL also has begun requiring owners to notify the league when they begin a sales procedure. The league has often found out about potential team sales through the press, but in the future, owners will be expected to alert the league as they begin to put together a sales pitch — even if that pitch is just for a percentage stake in a team.

The league feels that both rules will help it respond to questions regarding not only relationships between owners but also potential franchise sales, sources said.


:lol: This is only what, 60 years too late?

_________________
Thanks Chuck!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:38 pm 
Offline
Illegitimate Luongo Child
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:46 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: North Vancouver
its like installing an alarm after you just got robbed!

_________________
"if your parachute doesn't open up while skydiving, don't worry, you have the rest of your life to figure it out"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:20 am 
Offline
OTP Witch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:54 am
Posts: 235
Location: Second Star to the Right
I don't get it. What happened to the concept that you have a business (or businesses) that make a hell of a lot of money - you not only can buy a sports team - you can support that team through tough years.

Simple prospect - you have the money to back AND support the team. Dare I say, Mike Illich.

What the fuck is happening here - people are "buying" teams when they have NO funds?

Enlighten me, please.

Lil

_________________
CARPE DUH

Seize the idiot


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:58 am 
Offline
OTP Historian
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 4626
Lillith wrote:
What the fuck is happening here - people are "buying" teams when they have NO funds?

Enlighten me, please.

Lil


Yup, that's basically what happened with Bootsy. He committed fraud to get loans to buy a part of the Preds...and borrowed the money from other NHL owners, those close to Bettman.

This has happened for years, anyways. One guy buying the Islanders didn't have a dollar when the old owner of the Isles cashed his cheque. Teams and owners have gone bankrupt. The NHL has a really shitty track record when it comes to ownership. Even when some guys manage to get the funds together, they don't have the dollars to fund the day-to-day operations and cover the dedt on the rink(Ottawa Senators a few years ago).

Alan Eagleson loaned the NHL money to keep the Cleveland Barons afloat in the '70s. Know who's money he loaned them? The NHLPA's money, without the consent of the players, because he was the "head" of the NHLPA.

When the NHL announced expansion for the 67-68 season, guess who owned the St. Louis Blues? Nobody. They announced a franchise there because they wanted one there, and nobody had applied for it.

_________________
Thanks Chuck!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:58 am 
Offline
Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:51 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Ottawa, ON
Balsillie's hands may not be so clean after all... which could make him perfect for the NHL!

http://business.theglobeandmail.com/ser ... iness/home

Globe and Mail wrote:
The Ontario Securities Commission is seeking a record penalty — one that could be as high as $100-million — from the top two executives of Research In Motion Ltd. to pay for their role in a stock option accounting controversy dating back to 1996.

According to people familiar with settlement discussions, the OSC's staff is in advanced discussions with lawyers representing RIM's co-chief executive officers, Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis. The OSC's investigation began in 2006 and sources said the regulator began negotiating a potential settlement last fall.

It is understood that the OSC has pushed for Mr. Balsillie to pay the bulk of any penalty and relinquish his seat on RIM's board of directors for a period of time. Although one person familiar with the talks said the parties are nearing a potential agreement, nothing has been finalized, including how much each executive may have to pay.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:55 pm 
Offline
Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:51 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Ottawa, ON
Do former owners count?

Former Edmonton Oilers owner Peter Pocklington has been arrested on bankruptcy fraud charges in California, U.S. court filings show.

Mr. Pocklington will be formally charged Wednesday afternoon with filing false bankruptcy declarations, as well as making false oaths and accounts in bankruptcy.

He faces up to 10 years in a federal prison, U.S. Attorney spokesman Thom Mrozek said in an interview.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:14 pm 
Offline
OTP Historian
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 4626
Jyrki21 wrote:
Do former owners count?

Former Edmonton Oilers owner Peter Pocklington has been arrested on bankruptcy fraud charges in California, U.S. court filings show.

Mr. Pocklington will be formally charged Wednesday afternoon with filing false bankruptcy declarations, as well as making false oaths and accounts in bankruptcy.

He faces up to 10 years in a federal prison, U.S. Attorney spokesman Thom Mrozek said in an interview.


Yes, because they'll probably give him another team soon enough.

_________________
Thanks Chuck!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:17 pm 
Offline
Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 12366
That would put both owners involved in the Gretzky trade in prison if he were to be found guilty.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:46 am 
Offline
Tattoo of the Post
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:54 pm
Posts: 2221
I would like to point out that the Islanders were trail blazers in teams bought with no-money down. No really, Spano had nothing other than made up bank receipts! Typical- LA is about 15 years behind NY. 8-)

_________________
I say let Bettman & Fehr have a duel. The one standing wins for his side, then must quit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:55 pm 
Offline
Old Man of the Post
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:53 pm
Posts: 5901
Location: Inside your computer
The plot thickens...

Sportsnet.ca wrote:
The National Hockey League has met with an unidentified business group to discuss the possibility of adding another NHL team to the Greater Toronto Area, according to a newspaper report on Thursday.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:09 pm 
Offline
Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:51 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Ottawa, ON
Interestingly, though, they're not gunning for Mississauga but for Vaughan:

The unidentified group met with NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly in downtown Toronto last week, according to sources. The group proposes to build an arena at the intersection of Highways 427 and 7 in Vaughan, Ont., on land north of Pearson International Airport that's owned by businessman Victor De Zen.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:22 pm 
Offline
Illegitimate Luongo Child
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:46 pm
Posts: 2160
Location: North Vancouver
id rather have a team in Seattle before another goes to Toronto.

then we can move Detroit outta our dam conference!

_________________
"if your parachute doesn't open up while skydiving, don't worry, you have the rest of your life to figure it out"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:03 pm 
Offline
2003-04 Goalie Profiles Coming Soon!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:13 pm
Posts: 8171
Location: Saskabush
MrBumpNgrind wrote:
id rather have a team in Seattle before another goes to Toronto.

then we can move Detroit outta our dam conference!

We'll get Columbus first!

_________________
I will smash your face into a, into a jelly!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group